Problems with carbon dating accuracy

Unless this effect (which is additional to the magnetic field issue just discussed) were corrected for, carbon dating of fossils formed in the flood would give ages much older than the true ages.

Creationist researchers have suggested that dates of 35,000 - 45,000 years should be re-calibrated to the biblical date of the flood.[6] Such a re-calibration makes sense of anomalous data from carbon dating—for example, very discordant “dates” for different parts of a frozen musk ox carcass from Alaska and an inordinately slow rate of accumulation of ground sloth dung pellets in the older layers of a cave where the layers were carbon dated.[7] Also, volcanoes emit much COC.

This is the “half-life.” So, in two half-lives, or 11,460 years, only one-quarter of that in living organisms at present, then it has a theoretical age of 11,460 years.

Anything over about 50,000 years old, should theoretically have no detectable C.

So, we have a “clock” which starts ticking the moment something dies.

Obviously, this works only for things which were once living.

It makes no sense at all if man appeared at the end of billions of years.That is, they take up less than would be expected and so they test older than they really are.Furthermore, different types of plants discriminate differently.These techniques, unlike carbon dating, mostly use the relative concentrations of parent and daughter products in radioactive decay chains.For example, potassium-40 decays to argon-40; uranium-238 decays to lead-206 via other elements like radium; uranium-235 decays to lead-207; rubidium-87 decays to strontium-87; etc.

Search for problems with carbon dating accuracy:

problems with carbon dating accuracy-47problems with carbon dating accuracy-16

It does not give dates of millions of years and when corrected properly fits well with the biblical flood.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “problems with carbon dating accuracy”